President-elect Donald Trump filed a brief Friday with the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to block a law requiring that the social media platform TikTok either be sold or shut down by Jan. 19.
In April, President Joe Biden signed legislation allowing the ban of the Chinese-owned social media platform unless it is sold to a non-Chinese company within the year. Despite the company’s attempts to challenge the legislation as the shutdown date approaches, a panel of three judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled unanimously on Dec. 6 that the ban would be upheld, citing TikTok as a potential national security risk due to the Chinese government’s involvement with the app.
“President Trump alone possesses the consummate deal-making expertise, the electoral mandate and the political will to negotiate a resolution to save the platform while addressing the national security concerns expressed by the government — concerns which President Trump himself has acknowledged,” the brief said.
In this photo illustration, the TikTok logo is displayed on an iPhone. (Photo Illustration by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
The Supreme Court on Dec. 18 agreed to hear TikTok’s challenge against the ban, with oral arguments set to begin Jan. 10. In its emergency application to the high court, the social media platform argued that the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, which is the basis for the ban, will not only “shutter” the U.S.’s “most popular speech platform the day before a presidential inauguration,” but will also “silence the speech of Applicants and the many Americans who use the platform to communicate about politics, commerce, arts, and other matters of public concern.”
Despite attempts to ban the app through executive orders, Trump flipped his stance and publicly opposed legislation targeting TikTok, stating the move to ban the social media platform could potentially benefit Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook.
“If you get rid of TikTok, Facebook and Zuckerschmuck will double their business. I don’t want Facebook, who cheated in the last Election, doing better. They are a true Enemy of the People!” Trump posted to Truth Social in March.
However, concerns about the platform being a national security threat began with the former president in July 2020 after his first administration declared ZTE and Huawei national security threats. Since that call four years ago, both Republicans and Democrats have voiced concerns over the app, with Democrats like Virginia Sen. Mark Warner and Massachusetts Rep. Seth Moulton stating that TikTok has been stealing data and influencing America’s youth.
In June 2023, TikTok admitted to lawmakers that some Americans’ sensitive data is stored in China, despite TikTok CEO Shou Chew previously testifying in March that year that American data was “always” stored in both Virginia and Singapore.
The admission came after Republican Tennessee Sen. Marsha Blackburn and Democratic Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal sent a joint letter to the platform with further questions about the company after a Forbes investigation revealed that the social media platform housed its largest American and European creators’ financial data in China.
In addition to his request to handle the issue once in office on Jan. 20, the brief noted Trump’s large following on TikTok, arguing that it allows him to “actively” communicate with supporters.
“President Trump is one of the most powerful, prolific and influential users of social media in history,” the brief said. “Consistent with his commanding presence in this area, President Trump currently has 14.7 million followers on TikTok with whom he actively communicates, allowing him to evaluate TikTok’s importance as a unique medium for freedom of expression, including core political speech.”
TikTok additionally filed a brief Friday to the Supreme Court claiming the law being used to aid the ban was a violation of the First Amendment.
“The government has banned an extraordinary amount of speech; demands deference to unsubstantiated predictions a future risk will materialize; and gets facts wrong when it bothers to provide them,” the brief said.
“Congress’s unprecedented attempt to single out petitioners and bar them from operating one of the nation’s most significant speech venues is profoundly unconstitutional,” the brief continued.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].