Demo


    Xinjiang Communist Party Secretary Ma Xingrui attends the Xinjiang delegation meeting during the 14th National People’s Congress (NPC) in Beijing on March 7, 2024. Greg Baker/AFP via Getty Images

    The Chinese Communist Party, in a July 14 notice, accused former Politburo member Ma Xingrui of financial and moral corruption and abuse of power, and analysts noted that it stopped short of saying Ma had built an independent political network or challenged Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s authority.

    Since Xi took power in 2012 and launched his anti-corruption campaign, notices against many purged senior officials have gone beyond financial misconduct. They have accused officials of creating personal factions, concealing disloyalty, or seeking power outside the leadership structure controlled by Xi.

    Ma’s notice contained none of those more explicit accusations.

    In the CCP’s disciplinary language, such charges portray an official as building a personal power base or withholding obedience from the Party’s top leader.

    Cai Shenkun, an independent China commentator, told the Chinese edition of The Epoch Times that the omission was notable because the public account did not fully explain the political forces behind the removal of a sitting Politburo member.

    “This wasn’t just a financial matter; there were political factors at play,” Cai said. “They aren’t being mentioned because the implications are too broad and involve too many people.”

    Analysts See Effort to Limit Fallout

    Cai said the emphasis on financial misconduct and “family corruption” allowed the Party to punish Ma without publicly expanding the case into an examination of the political relationships around him.

    A broader account, he said, could implicate more officials and create anxiety within the CCP’s upper ranks ahead of its next national congress, expected in 2027.

    Shen Ming-Shih, a research fellow at Taiwan’s Institute for National Defense and Security Research, said he believed the wording was intended to keep the case from drawing attention to Ma’s reported personal ties to Xi’s family.

    Ma’s family and Xi’s wife, Peng Liyuan, are both from Yuncheng County in eastern China’s Shandong Province. Earlier Epoch Times reporting cited sources and commentators who described longstanding ties between their families.

    Earlier Insiders Pointed to Loyalty

    Questions about Ma’s political standing emerged before the final disciplinary notice.

    After regime authorities announced the launch of an investigation into Ma in April, China-based insiders told The Epoch Times that they believed the case concerned political control as well as corruption.

    One source described the central issue as Ma becoming “politically uncontrollable.”

    The initial announcement also omitted the title “comrade” before Ma’s name, a departure the earlier report described as an indication that the CCP had already reached a severe political judgment.

    Ma, 66, served on the Politburo, the CCP’s second-highest decision-making body, and previously held top posts in Xinjiang, Guangdong, and Shenzhen.

    His removal created a third vacancy in the Politburo during a wider purge of senior CCP and military officials, as The Epoch Times reported on July 14.

    The official notice said Ma’s suspected bribery offenses and related assets had been transferred to prosecutors. His expulsion from the CCP still requires ratification at a future plenary meeting of the Central Committee.

    We had a problem loading this article. Please enable javascript or use a different browser. If the issue persists, please visit our help center.



    Source link

    Share.
    Leave A Reply